Page 2 of 5
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:35 am
by Lantis
dg_102 wrote:Hi,
I did upgrade 1.9.1 to this version on TL-WDR4300 v1, unfortunately now it reboots on it's own about 5-10 seconds after it comes up.
Any ideas what can I do?
Thank you,
dg.
Do a failsafe reset.
Instructions on google or on this forum.
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:45 am
by -KAPMA-
Yes I understand this. But this is not observed 1.9.1.
The main argument in favor of the 40 MHz: I live outside the city, I do not see any other Wi-Fi networks.
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:35 am
by Lantis
It is the same in 1.9.1, nothing there has changed.
Please show a logread after saving your wifi settings.
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:15 am
by tapper
dg_102 wrote:Hi,
I did upgrade 1.9.1 to this version on TL-WDR4300 v1, unfortunately now it reboots on it's own about 5-10 seconds after it comes up.
Any ideas what can I do?
Thank you,
dg.
Hi did you save settings? If so you will have to do a falesafe.
https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/generic.failsafe
If it's old bandwidth dater then unplug your wan and login to the gargoyle and do a reset from the GUI.
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:44 am
by -KAPMA-
The logs here is after the restart wi-fi.
http://pastebin.com/k9c99T7e
Responses of the router is also increased. Usually, it is 2 ms.
Code: Select all
Reply[1] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=6.6 ms TTL=64
Reply[2] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=4.8 ms TTL=64
Reply[3] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=9.3 ms TTL=64
Reply[4] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=131.0 ms TTL=64
Reply[5] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=43.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[6] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=113.6 ms TTL=64
Reply[7] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=11.4 ms TTL=64
Reply[8] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=5.9 ms TTL=64
Reply[9] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=9.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[10] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=9.9 ms TTL=64
Reply[11] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=4.9 ms TTL=64
Reply[12] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=10.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[13] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=6.7 ms TTL=64
Reply[14] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=6.3 ms TTL=64
Reply[15] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=11.9 ms TTL=64
Reply[16] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=46.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[17] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=7.3 ms TTL=64
Reply[18] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=63.1 ms TTL=64
Reply[19] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=206.1 ms TTL=64
Reply[20] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=29.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[21] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=37.1 ms TTL=64
Reply[22] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=9.5 ms TTL=64
Reply[23] from 192.168.1.2: bytes=10240 time=8.2 ms TTL=64
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:43 pm
by Lantis
Lots didn't reveal anything unusual.
I'm not seeing this error on my end. Works fine at 40mhz
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 7:22 pm
by -KAPMA-
Lantis wrote:Lots didn't reveal anything unusual.
I'm not seeing this error on my end. Works fine at 40mhz
It seems to me that this, as always only 941nd v3. Unsuccessful model

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:19 pm
by dg_102
Failsafe reset worked like a charm. And yes, I did preserve settings. It was from 1.9.1 to 1.9.x
Thank you Tapper and Lantis.
dg
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:37 pm
by ispyisail
dg_102 wrote:Failsafe reset worked like a charm. And yes, I did preserve settings. It was from 1.9.1 to 1.9.x
Thank you Tapper and Lantis.
dg
I wondered that.
Even with a big warning sign not to preserve settings?
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-November-01 08:38.torrent
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:45 am
by d3fz