Re: Gargoyle Raw Performance
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:12 am
I had to try one more test with a different router.
Broadcom chipset - Buffalo WHR-G125 - running DD-WRT
Exact same tests as above, with 250MB file
HUGE difference in speed transfer rates / throughput
Only reason I am not running Gargoyle on this router is
because Gargoyle currently doesn't work on this router.
----------------------
Edit:
I found out this router does support Tomato firmware
Flashed latest Tomato 1.25.1719 on the router and ran same test
Looks like Tomato is running the fastest so far.
Broadcom chipset - Buffalo WHR-G125 - running DD-WRT
Exact same tests as above, with 250MB file
HUGE difference in speed transfer rates / throughput
Only reason I am not running Gargoyle on this router is
because Gargoyle currently doesn't work on this router.
----------------------
Edit:
I found out this router does support Tomato firmware
Flashed latest Tomato 1.25.1719 on the router and ran same test
Looks like Tomato is running the fastest so far.