Gargoyle Forum

d3fz wrote:Good point.

I believe i've seen this discussed before, that's why i pointed it out, not sure now if it was Gargoyle's QoS so..

I'll post here if i find anything related to that.

We're all here to learn and everyone else who reads this for posterity, will appreciate our accuracy hahaha. I do think what you say is optimal though. There can be some edge case scenarios where traffic can be miscategorized.

flashfir wrote: We're all here to learn and everyone else who reads this for posterity, will appreciate our accuracy hahaha. I do think what you say is optimal though. There can be some edge case scenarios where traffic can be miscategorized.

Definitely!

Found the thread i was talking about, it turns out that class priority is defined by setting a minimum bandwidth, as pbix clarifies a few posts later:

pbix wrote:The priority comes from the minimum bandwidth setting. Games have a fixed and small bandwidth requirement and this is how it is specified.

Discussion thread:
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4919#p21130

d3fz wrote:

flashfir wrote: Found the thread i was talking about, it turns out that class priority is defined by setting a minimum bandwidth, as pbix clarifies a few posts later:

pbix wrote:The priority comes from the minimum bandwidth setting. Games have a fixed and small bandwidth requirement and this is how it is specified.

Discussion thread:
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4919#p21130

True, but the rule order still matters since it matches from the top down. A rule at the top with matching criteria may move traffic into an unintended class.