Page 1 of 3

gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:29 am
by ispyisail
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK


gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent
https://goo.gl/rru6AO



magnet:?xt=urn:btih:0be18d3d74653ecb67e2522c39b229a59a52498b&dn=gargoyle-ispy%202016-June-28%2001_18.7z&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80&tr=udp%3a%2f%2fopen.demonii.com%3a1337&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3a6969&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3a6969




Routers
https://goo.gl/FQohy3

Generate Gargoyle images for TP-Link TL-WR841 v10 and v11 routers

Modify gargoyle_button_handlers to make work all buttons on TP-Link TL-WR841 v9, v10 and v11

Add wps file back to rc.button to make work reboot button again on all supported devices.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:43 pm
by petbrau
I don't like the torrent client.
...and maybe some others have the same opinion.
Therefore, I decided to open my private NAS at least for one week, to give you the possibility to download these files in a standard way. Under

(...)

you will find what you want.
Be patient, because my internet connection is not the fastest.

Addendum:
As expected, after about one week, there is no need for these files anymore. Therefore I close my file-server herewith.
About 10 downloads per day with 10 MB each, is really no traffic we should think about. Maybe in the future, I will open my NAS once again.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 7:43 pm
by ispyisail
I don't like the torrent client.
Why not?

Just for interest.......

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:57 pm
by meazz1
petbrau wrote:I don't like the torrent client.
...and maybe some others have the same opinion.
Therefore, I decided to open my private NAS at least for one week, to give you the possibility to download these files in a standard way. Under

http://braun.spacetechnology.net:7000/sharing/r4l9sfwmt

you will find what you want.
Be patient, because my internet connection is not the fastest.
Thanks fir the NAS, there are time I want to download files when I am at work but torrent client is blocked at work.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:57 pm
by ispyisail
Thanks fir the NAS, there are time I want to download files when I am at work but torrent client is blocked at work.
really?

:)

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:12 am
by Lantis
That's because work time is for work :P (he posts while in a meeting).

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:34 am
by ispyisail
I don't like the torrent client.
...and maybe some others have the same opinion.
Just for interest I have tried other methods but the load is significant.

I'm currently running 3 seed servers

Are they are all using many Gigabytes of data

Image


This is not a problem by the way, but without torrents it can get out of control.

Just for interest my last seed server is a small "Raspberry pi 3" great machine for that.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:23 am
by thekk
Is it possible that you additional post the openwrt base version used for ur releases?
Its much easier to decide if i upgrade my system or not if the other changes are not important for me.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:34 am
by meazz1
Lantis wrote:That's because work time is for work :P (he posts while in a meeting).
Yes, Lol.
Anyway, my ISP limits monthly bandwidth for residential customer and it's not an issue for my employer if I'm downloading some bin files for router! It's a win win for both :D

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2016-June-28 01:18.torrent

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:15 am
by Lantis
thekk wrote:Is it possible that you additional post the openwrt base version used for ur releases?
Its much easier to decide if i upgrade my system or not if the other changes are not important for me.
You'll see the change listed "Bump Openwrt revision".
If it doesn't say that, openwrt didn't change.

If it says there's been a revision change, you can find the changes listed on the openwrt website :)