Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Want to share your OpenWrt / Gargoyle knowledge? Implemented a new feature? Let us know here.

Moderator: Moderators

doug_porsche
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:59 pm

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by doug_porsche »

NETGEAR WNDR3700v4 is the router I am using.
NETGEAR WNDR3700v4 or an old Soup can with string. So hard to tell these days.

n8b
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2015 1:20 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by n8b »

:D
TRENDnet tew-691gr.

manwithoutachance
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:37 am

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by manwithoutachance »

Archer C7 V2 is my router

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6735
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by Lantis »

There's no need to list routers that are already supported, of course.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

mlira1
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 9:31 pm

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by mlira1 »

I would love to see WR1043N V5 supported.

Also, I have noticed a UPnP/NAT-PMP minor issue on this build on the WR1043ND V1.

It works, but when the router is restarted, it stops working and you need to disable and re-enable the feature for it to work again.

mojolacerator
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:24 am
Location: Canada

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by mojolacerator »

PLEASE generate an x86 image !

I am running this ; https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/ ... ts/x86/64/

Works fantastic, but I miss the Gargoyle interface and all the pre-installed goodies.

There is a growing number of people parking their consumer routers and going with an old pc. I am running on an i5-2400, with 4gb ram, the network is just flying !!!

:twisted:
Gargoyle

i5-3550, 8gb ram, 120gb ssd

SisterFister
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:48 pm

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by SisterFister »

Lantis wrote:I want to know what routers people want to see supported in 1.11.x.
Which routers are we missing from the targets we already support that are popular and you want to see support for? This is relatively easy for me to add. If anyone sends a suggestion for a router with 4MB of flash i'll throw something at them. :lol:
ar71xx, brcm47xx, mvebu, ramips

Which targets are popular that aren't already supported and you think should be? This is harder for me to do as i can't test it. But there's some things worth doing as they are popular models.
ipq806x
I would like to see the F9K1115 supported. It is supported on OpenWRT if that helps any. Since QOS received a little TLC I'm eager to experience the newer version in Gargoyle.

Which leads me to ask, is any currently-OpenWRT supported router capable of being built on the latest Gargoyle code?
Last edited by SisterFister on Fri Jul 13, 2018 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6735
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by Lantis »

mlira1 wrote:I would love to see WR1043N V5 supported.

Also, I have noticed a UPnP/NAT-PMP minor issue on this build on the WR1043ND V1.

It works, but when the router is restarted, it stops working and you need to disable and re-enable the feature for it to work again.
Is this using the build I posted or ispyisail? I’ll look into it if it’s mine, otherwise I suggest trying it to see.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

Lantis
Moderator
Posts: 6735
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:33 am
Location: Australia

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by Lantis »

SisterFister wrote:
Lantis wrote:I want to know what routers people want to see supported in 1.11.x.
Which routers are we missing from the targets we already support that are popular and you want to see support for? This is relatively easy for me to add. If anyone sends a suggestion for a router with 4MB of flash i'll throw something at them. :lol:
ar71xx, brcm47xx, mvebu, ramips

Which targets are popular that aren't already supported and you think should be? This is harder for me to do as i can't test it. But there's some things worth doing as they are popular models.
ipq806x
I would like to see the F9K1115 supported. It is supported on OpenWRT if that helps any. Since QOS received a little TLC I'm eager to experience the newer version in Gargoyle.

Which leads me to ask, is any currently-OpenWRT supported router capable of being built on the latest Gargoyle code?

p.s. An imag
Yes and no. If you know what you are doing, then yes. If not, it would be wise to wait a bit longer for the Custom profile to be reworked for the new version which will make it easier.
http://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoyle_ispyisail.php for the latest releases
Please be respectful when posting. I do this in my free time on a volunteer basis.

mlira1
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2018 9:31 pm

Re: Bleeding Edge (mvebu + AR71xx) gargoyle-ispy 2018-June-29 22:45

Post by mlira1 »

Lantis wrote:
mlira1 wrote:I would love to see WR1043N V5 supported.

Also, I have noticed a UPnP/NAT-PMP minor issue on this build on the WR1043ND V1.

It works, but when the router is restarted, it stops working and you need to disable and re-enable the feature for it to work again.
Is this using the build I posted or ispyisail? I’ll look into it if it’s mine, otherwise I suggest trying it to see.
I have used ipsysail's build indeed, but apparently there wasn't builds for WR1043ND V1 nor WDR4300 v1 at the link you provided. They are the routers I use with Gargoyle.

Post Reply