I see from your other post that https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custom/1.13.x/ is where the latest IPv6 test builds.
OK to Preserve Settings from https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_cust ... st_builds/ if you're on the latest build from there?
Search found 37 matches
- Fri Jun 19, 2020 3:04 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
- Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:43 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Another smooth update.
Just upgraded to 20200614-1235 git@00d50fef with preserve settings, added in plugin sources, installed and enabled adblock and other favourite plugins.
Just upgraded to 20200614-1235 git@00d50fef with preserve settings, added in plugin sources, installed and enabled adblock and other favourite plugins.
- Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:12 pm
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Thanks for setting up a test account. Thanks for finding a fix. Remote IPs now seem to work some of the time. I'm using OpenDNS, but might try out google and others. Further testing this morning: 201 is returned when no update is required (so this would be a successful return in a force update scen...
- Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:13 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
If not, I can set up a DDNS entry, and then share it with you for testing - updates are via a token rather than the account password, and I'm pretty sure I can set up a token for a specific DDNS entry.
- Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:11 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Seeing a bit of this in the log - no discernable impact on connection. Tue Jun 9 18:30:59 2020 kern.warn kernel: [ 1091.959512] nf_conntrack: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet Tue Jun 9 18:31:00 2020 kern.warn kernel: [ 1092.719043] nf_conntrack: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet Tue...
- Tue Jun 09, 2020 4:29 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Another smooth update.
Just upgraded to 20200607-0310 git@8755fb93 with preserve settings, added in plugin sources, installed and enabled adblock and logread and dark one theme.
Now installing other favourite plugins.
Just upgraded to 20200607-0310 git@8755fb93 with preserve settings, added in plugin sources, installed and enabled adblock and logread and dark one theme.
Now installing other favourite plugins.
- Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:18 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Smooth update. Nothing (specific to this release, IPv6) to report. Had hoped that perhaps the changes to ewget might have worked around the problem with DDNS being reporting that it is unable to get the remote IP for my DDNS hosted on zoneedit.com - it logs "remote IP cannot be determined"...
- Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:18 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Sweet, will try it after work hours and report back.
- Mon Jun 01, 2020 9:31 pm
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
I see new builds (23rd May) for ipq086x in https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_cust ... st_builds/
Are these ready for testing?
If already on the ipq806x builds from
https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custom/ipv6/ipq806x/ should these be preserve settings or clean installs?
Are these ready for testing?
If already on the ipq806x builds from
https://lantisproject.com/gargoyle_custom/ipv6/ipq806x/ should these be preserve settings or clean installs?
- Mon May 25, 2020 3:39 am
- Forum: Gargoyle Development
- Topic: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
- Replies: 76
- Views: 128784
Re: Gargoyle IPv6 Testing
Are you running IPv6 or just IPv4? IPv6 LAN IPv4 WAN (Optus) Was the QoS trouble with the new functionality or just QoS in general? Just in general: was trying to use ACC to further limit the class associated with the errant users if the link was under pressure, but it appeared to reduce the Fair L...