Search found 70 matches
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:27 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quota assignments not quite right?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9011
Re: Quota assignments not quite right?
Spoke too soon :-(. After over nite checked again and I'm back to having two entries for the .7 system. Also noticed that the value listed for the download in the Bandwidth Distribution is higher than the Quota Usage page. One system from the 60-66 group has a download for the day over 4.4gig, but t...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:33 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quota assignments not quite right?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9011
Re: Quota assignments not quite right?
Didn't think to, but now that I have things seem to look better. Thanks!
- Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:12 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quota assignments not quite right?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9011
Re: Quota assignments not quite right?
Still getting google drive sorted... is that working better?
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:04 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Quota assignments not quite right?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9011
Quota assignments not quite right?
Ok, so my quotas may be odd, not sure, but this was working ok for 1.8.1 I have 3 sets, - an IP range with no download limit, and a very large upload limit (to essentially exclude them from being throttled on download in the last rule) - a download limit for a IP range (so for a group) - then a 'for...
- Mon Aug 01, 2016 3:37 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wired bridge AP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4571
Re: Wired bridge AP
A possibly interesting observation (using 1.9.x from July 23) is that after each reboot it appears that DHCP is turned back on again (at least the checkbox is enabled).
- Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:38 am
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Wired bridge AP
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4571
Re: Wired bridge AP
Adding to the thread since I have this question as well... my need for a bridge is to extend my wireless network into an area where there is no wifi signal to speak of (so wireless bridge not possible), and I want to have the 'front end' AP handle all the DHCP/Quota/QOS/etc so I don't want to just h...
- Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:53 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: WRT1900ACS v2?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5204
Re: WRT1900ACS v2?
Sounds like maybe a minor chip rev, but no real details (yet)...
http://community.linksys.com/t5/Wireles ... -p/1038222
off to find a V1
http://community.linksys.com/t5/Wireles ... -p/1038222
off to find a V1
- Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:19 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: WRT1900ACS v2?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5204
WRT1900ACS v2?
From what I'm seeing on the Linksys download page, the WRT1900ACS now has a v2 hardware version (or may have had one awhile, I'm new to looking at it). Does anyone know if the shelby build works with the v2 or is the v2 version not supported?
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:27 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13296
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Well, looks like 15.05.1 will have 3.18.23 if I'm reading the OpenWRT front page correctly...?
- Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:18 pm
- Forum: Network / Wireless Issues
- Topic: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 13296
Re: Gargoyle NAT 'leaking' port 443?
Goes something like:
'internet' <-> (xx.xx.xx.xx) provider's router (10.0.0.1) <-> (10.0.0.3) Gargoyle router (192.168.1.2) <-> (192.168.1.x) private lan
'internet' <-> (xx.xx.xx.xx) provider's router (10.0.0.1) <-> (10.0.0.3) Gargoyle router (192.168.1.2) <-> (192.168.1.x) private lan