Search found 17 matches
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 4:20 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: WRT1900AC all but email.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7066
Re: WRT1900AC all but email.
Do emails arrive if you run following command? sh /usr/lib/gargoyle/email.sh Also do any javascript error messages show up in console after saving settings? That triggers it to work. Takes about 30 seconds to respond. Tried different logging options and they work too. No errors show in logread. Con...
- Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:35 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: WRT1900AC all but email.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7066
Re: WRT1900AC all but email.
Installed sendmail and test message works, and shows up in the log. Scheduled emails do not happen, and show nothing in the log. When I make changes to the timer on the email setting page, EG; set timer increment to 5mins and save changes, when I come back to the page it has returned to the default ...
- Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:17 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: WRT1900AC all but email.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7066
WRT1900AC all but email.
Ok... I just updated from 1.9.0 to 1.9.x provided by Lantis. All good, and the unit is live. (my neighbor). Flashed 1.9.x as an sysupdate, all good. Restored config from 1.9.0, all good. Put back in place, unit now live... perfect update, nobody noticed. Stats for the last month are still available....
- Sun Nov 29, 2015 12:26 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: gargoyle-ispy 2015-November-18 08:37.torrent
- Replies: 28
- Views: 28355
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-November-18 08:37.torrent
Thanks for that... Will give it a go..
Safe to restore config from 1.9.0?
Safe to restore config from 1.9.0?
- Sat Nov 28, 2015 11:01 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: gargoyle-ispy 2015-November-18 08:37.torrent
- Replies: 28
- Views: 28355
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-November-18 08:37.torrent
I've noticed a few people on here are running the WRT1900AC.
I have set up one with 1.9.0 (For someone else) and its running ok.
I will be doing some work on it shortly and have 2 questions.
1.9.0 or 1.9.x recomendations please.
And can a config from 1.9.0 go straight back into 1.9.x?
Thanks.
I have set up one with 1.9.0 (For someone else) and its running ok.
I will be doing some work on it shortly and have 2 questions.
1.9.0 or 1.9.x recomendations please.
And can a config from 1.9.0 go straight back into 1.9.x?
Thanks.
- Fri Nov 27, 2015 10:19 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Email notifications plugin revisited
- Replies: 111
- Views: 259218
Re: Email notifications plugin revisited
Did a lot of testing today but can't get the plugin to work. I flashed a WDR3600 with 1.81 and 1.9 and installed the non SSL plugin through plugin's menu and also did a manually via the instructions on this thread and the updated version from http://dpint.si/storage/gargoyle/plugin-gargoyle-email-n...
- Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:48 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: Successfully flashed a router? Tell Us!
- Replies: 293
- Views: 707841
Re: Successfully flashed a router? Tell Us!
Ubnt airGateway. Flashed 1.9.0 (was airOS 1.0.3) Found problems with packages. http://i786.photobucket.com/albums/yy143/darkfibre2/Christmas%20Island/network/package%20sizes_zps7f6f07cp.png Re-flashed to 1.8.1 Packages now working. Manually installed email, unable to get messages sent, but test mess...
- Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:22 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: help me ! Nanostation M2 firmware
- Replies: 21
- Views: 18505
Re: help me ! Nanostation M2 firmware
Seems to be low spec.
4 Mb flash 16Mb ram.
My connection is via a Nanostation M2, BUT it is set as a bridge.
In bridge mode I have tested 3 different routers connected to it using Gargoyle.
Ubnt airGateway, Linksys WRT1900AC, TP-Link TL-WR1043ND
4 Mb flash 16Mb ram.
My connection is via a Nanostation M2, BUT it is set as a bridge.
In bridge mode I have tested 3 different routers connected to it using Gargoyle.
Ubnt airGateway, Linksys WRT1900AC, TP-Link TL-WR1043ND
- Sat Nov 21, 2015 1:01 am
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Using Quotas range vs fixed IP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3421
Re: Using Quotas range vs fixed IP
I found the quota files, and worked out the files well enough, but when I add a new ip quota file it does not come up in the rules. Saving changes deletes the new rule. Rebooting does not delete the rule but is still not showing in the interface. Every day I can drive this thing better, but not ther...
- Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:20 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Using Quotas range vs fixed IP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3421
Using Quotas range vs fixed IP
Hi people, Just trying to shortcut some testing. I will be installing Gargoyle on quite a few devices, and I am currently making up some generic rules based on IPs so when I flash a router I can restore some generic rules. If I have a rule for a range (192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20) that restricts bandw...