Gargoyle Forum

I have been installing the 1.0.16 fw with my fon 2100 http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/fon/fonera for a long time (since 2010 so & so)

which is the most recommended fw actually for this hardware router ?

sorry I forgot to say that I'm using mozilla ff 3.5.6 the warnings are not related to particular collateral effects (transparency but I'n not sure about the resulting effect) but those fields are ignored by the browser http://www.w3schools.com/Css/css_image_transparency.asp ff values are correct in ...

on themes/default/common.css I've found these 2 failed fields, bolded as follows:

#darken
{
top:0px;
width:100%;
height:100%;
overflow:hidden;

display:none;
background:#000000;
position:absolute;
z-index:2000;
opacity:0.75;
MozOpacity:0.75;
filter:alpha(opacity=75);
}

yes man but consider that fonera 2100 atheros chipset Is historically very hot (try to touch it from the baseline after some usage....) and another frequency raise can give reliability a broke (or something worse) the overclock can be done, but before doing so, I suggest to ensure an air flow throug...

another notice as you can see, openssl 1.1.0 is out I was trying to compile ewgetlib against latest openssl and I noticed another warning discarding pointer type here: SSL_METHOD* meth; as declared, now should be: const SSL_METHOD* meth; the piece of code is on initialize_connection_https() #ifdef H...

I know this feature is present on latest trunk snapshots only (after last 1.2.1 release) but i've seen that the main function on ewget.c file after updating is void and compiling the compiler warns about exit code value: Code is like so: void main(int argc char **argv) { .... exit(0); } while follow...

does your password include @ ?

try to see which ip is visible from the external view

http://www.whatsmyip.com

maybe you're under a NAT and ur ip is private

very thanks for your proposal: I'll keep in mind about the code: are u sure the string above is bad committed ? % is analyzed once because if encountered s is incremented of all the code, pointing next to %xx ex blablabla%2540 start checking escape when *s = '%' but in the next loop stroke it points...

try to see if adding 151.1.1.1

the /etc/resolv.conf is

nameserver 192.168.1.1
nameserver 151.1.1.1

or
nameserver 151.1.1.1
as it should be

obviously if nothing is added (default) you have
nameserver 192.168.1.1