Search found 134 matches
- Tue Feb 17, 2026 5:29 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 - 2026-03-23
- Replies: 49
- Views: 40428
Re: Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 - 2026-01-28
Hi All, Just want to mentioned using this released that when I enabled bandwidth monitoring, My internet connection is experiencing packet loss of around 40%-33% after 2-3 days, and it's not showing graph on the router gui. To enable graph again, I manually run this command "/usr/lib/gargoyle/...
- Sun Feb 15, 2026 6:47 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 - 2026-03-23
- Replies: 49
- Views: 40428
Re: Gargoyle 1.15.x OpenWrt 24.10 - 2026-01-28
Hi All, Just want to mentioned using this released that when I enabled bandwidth monitoring, My internet connection is experiencing packet loss of around 40%-33% after 2-3 days, and it's not showing graph on the router gui. To enable graph again, I manually run this command "/usr/lib/gargoyle/r...
- Sun Feb 15, 2026 12:41 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: wrt3200acm dnsmasq-full (ipv6 disable)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12918
Re: wrt3200acm dnsmasq-full (ipv6 disable)
Hi,
Yes, I used additional feature.
ok, will check that odhcpd.
Thanks
Yes, I used additional feature.
ok, will check that odhcpd.
Thanks
- Fri Feb 13, 2026 2:34 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: wrt3200acm dnsmasq-full (ipv6 disable)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12918
wrt3200acm dnsmasq-full (ipv6 disable)
Hi Lantis,
Good day! just want to ask if there is a way that we can have a dnsmasq-full package available that ipv6 is disabled by default.
Or Just wondering if we do have an option on the package when we installed it to disable ipv6.
Thanks
Good day! just want to ask if there is a way that we can have a dnsmasq-full package available that ipv6 is disabled by default.
Or Just wondering if we do have an option on the package when we installed it to disable ipv6.
Thanks
- Mon Feb 09, 2026 8:58 pm
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: GL.iNet flint3 vs flint2
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13693
Re: GL.iNet flint3 vs flint2
Thank you Lantis for your input, will wait for OpenWrt Project (“OpenWrt Two”) with GLiNet partnership.
I can still live with my wrt3200acm for now.
Regards
I can still live with my wrt3200acm for now.
Regards
- Thu Feb 05, 2026 5:35 am
- Forum: Hardware / Installation Issues
- Topic: GL.iNet flint3 vs flint2
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13693
GL.iNet flint3 vs flint2
Hi All, Good day everyone, just want to ask some opinions between these 2 models of GL.iNet Flint Routers. Which are best in terms opensource driver support on wifi and gargoyle support between these 2 models? ----------------------------------- GL.iNet Flint 3 BE9300 GL.iNet GL-MT6000 (Flint 2) ---...
- Sat Dec 28, 2024 6:57 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: port 22, 53 expose on nmap
- Replies: 4
- Views: 54647
Re: port 22, 53 expose on nmap
Hi Lantis,
I did not make a new firewall rule. I have use my mobile data again and tried to connect on port 21 using my external
IP, but it won't allow me to access it.
I guess I'm good for now, just wondering why the port is showing up.
Thank you!
I did not make a new firewall rule. I have use my mobile data again and tried to connect on port 21 using my external
IP, but it won't allow me to access it.
I guess I'm good for now, just wondering why the port is showing up.
Thank you!
- Thu Dec 26, 2024 6:02 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: port 22, 53 expose on nmap
- Replies: 4
- Views: 54647
Re: port 22, 53 expose on nmap
Hi Lantis, Yes, I have tethered on my phones wifi and confirm port 22 and 53 are not exposed on the external ip. But,I was surprised that nmap returns port 21 as open on external IP. I have check and there is no ftp service is running on the router. Have you or someone experience this? please let me...
- Wed Dec 25, 2024 6:44 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: port 22, 53 expose on nmap
- Replies: 4
- Views: 54647
port 22, 53 expose on nmap
Hi All, I have stopped service for rpcbind and uhttps, so that it won't show on nmap. Can someone please advise if we can prevent exposing these ports 22, 53 on the wan side? I have scan my external ip and these ports are exposed. can we allow port 22 and 53 to be internal network only. ============...
- Wed Dec 18, 2024 1:33 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2025-03-31 - Based on OpenWrt 23.05
- Replies: 286
- Views: 1680638
Re: Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2024-11-13 - Based on OpenWrt 23.05
Thank you Lantis for the link, appreciate it.Lantis wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 2:50 amNo, it is not.
Did you check page 2?
Or try filtering the table.
Filtered table