Yeah pbix will have to weigh in...CarpeNoctem wrote:So QoS and ACC still work even with bwmon disabled?robnitro wrote:You don't need bwmon... I always disable it and chmod -x it to be sure.
Search found 22 matches
- Sun Mar 15, 2015 3:35 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4607
Re: Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
- Thu Mar 05, 2015 12:44 pm
- Forum: Monitoring / Quota / QoS Issues
- Topic: Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4607
Will QoS still function with bwmon disable?
bwmon sucks up some connection speed and it's noticeable on very fast connections. Disabling it helps resolve that, but does disabling bwmon also prevent QoS from functioning?
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: after firmware 1.7.0 download speed dropped to 100 megabits
- Replies: 14
- Views: 13239
Re: after firmware 1.7.0 download speed dropped to 100 megab
The the kernel is barrier breaker wasn't compiled with a connection tracking cache, resulting in speed drops. This was fixed in Chaos Calmer, but I don't know if the changes were ever backported.
- Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:18 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: gargoyle-ispy 2015-February-23 05:34.torrent
- Replies: 13
- Views: 15596
Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-February-23 05:34.torrent
Hey iSpy, I'm working on creating builds as well.
When I run build.sh, what do I pass it if I only want to build usb images or usb-large images?
What are the specs of your build machine that it's taking 8 hours to build?
Thanks.
When I run build.sh, what do I pass it if I only want to build usb images or usb-large images?
What are the specs of your build machine that it's taking 8 hours to build?
Thanks.
- Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:49 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-November-09.7z AA Final
- Replies: 37
- Views: 62847
Re: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-November-09.7z
I'm still running on the iSpy July build as I've read about too many wireless issues with newer ones.
Any comments on how well the wireless works on this build would be appreciated. Is ANI reenabled by default on these builds?
Any comments on how well the wireless works on this build would be appreciated. Is ANI reenabled by default on these builds?
- Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:46 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Guest network support for Gargoyle 1.6.2
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20414
Re: Guest network support for Gargoyle 1.6.2
Looks great. It'd be nice if you could also choose to tunnel guest traffic through TOR that way I don't have to be responsible for my guest's traffic.
- Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:41 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-March-15.7z
- Replies: 13
- Views: 19024
Re: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-March-15.7z
This build does indeed include the latest ath9k fixes backported from Barrier Breaker. It's working great on my TP-Link WNDR3600. Also, the signal strength reporting of my devices shows a significant improvement! This is a great build. Thanks to Eric for Gargoyle and iSpy for building intermediate b...
- Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:18 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-March-15.7z
- Replies: 13
- Views: 19024
Re: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-March-15.7z
Were the latest Ath9k fixes from Barrier Breaker that were discussed in a February build thread backported and included in this Attitude Adjustment build?
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Mon Feb 17, 2014 10:18 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-February-16.7z
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17533
Re: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-February-16.7z
Thanks for building this.
- Fri Feb 14, 2014 3:23 pm
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-February-09.7z
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14549
Re: Gargoyle-ispy 2014-February-09.7z
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK Gargoyle-ispy 2014-February-09.7z http://goo.gl/Y9Lmf6 fix bug in torip.sh causing issues with activating tor for specific IP addresses, as pointed out by Rog66 on the forum Revert "improved fix for issues with Chrome" Does this use a newer OpenWRT Attitude adjustment...