Search found 30 matches
- Sat Jan 18, 2025 10:28 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2025-03-31 - Based on OpenWrt 23.05
- Replies: 273
- Views: 273580
Gargoyle 1.15.x BETA - 2024-11-13 - Success on GL.iNet GL-AR150
Just wanted to let you know about having success with 1.15.X (Built 20241113 -0044) on a GL.iNet GL-AR150 (ath79 on LantisProject: https://lantisproject.com/downloads/gargoylebuilds/details?build=1.15.x_20241113&target=ath79 ): Fresh Installation up from 1.13 went smooth - however, it took like ...
- Sat Jun 10, 2023 9:38 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
- Replies: 82
- Views: 1950731
Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
A boot log would be interesting. This may require a serial connection to view. If you can get it, please open another thread and we will dig into it. 1. I ordered this UART USB-to-TTL adapter and will see what I can do with the TL-WR710N. Do you have a recommendation about which instruction to foll...
- Fri Jun 09, 2023 6:53 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
- Replies: 82
- Views: 1950731
Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
... 2) However, I was not successful with my TP-Link TL-WR710N V2.1 (a 8/32 MB device). It always settles into "steady blinking about 2-3 times per second". Pings to 192.168.1.1 (own address set without DHCP) are replied to most of the time some time after booting, but then often fail aga...
- Fri Jun 09, 2023 6:05 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
- Replies: 82
- Views: 1950731
Re: Version 1.14.0: Based on OpenWrt 22.03
I would like to give two feedbacks on 1.14.0: 1) I managed to successfuly install it on my **GL.iNet GL-AR150**! Used it a little as a Wifi repeater. No problems so far! :D 2) However, I was not successful with my TP-Link TL-WR710N V2.1 (a 8/32 MB device). It always settles into "steady blinkin...
- Sun Feb 19, 2023 6:22 am
- Forum: Show / Tell / Contribute
- Topic: Experimental Gargoyle 1.15.x (released as 1.14) beta 20230124
- Replies: 134
- Views: 423152
usbmuxd takes 50% of CPU time
Hi, I successfully flashed this experimental build to my GLiNet AR150. | Gargoyle version 1.15.X | OpenWrt 22.03 branch | Gargoyle revision 81dcda3c| OpenWrt commit f7541ae | Built February 17, 2023 | Target ath79/default However, according to top the usbmuxd daemon is taking 50% CPU time (with a lo...
- Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:42 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Support for TP-Link TL-WR710n
- Replies: 33
- Views: 98196
Re: Support for TP-Link TL-WR710n (plus AVM Fritz!Repeater 300E)
BTW: I updated my building instructions on TL-WR710N for the AVM Fritz!Repeater 300E, too. Let me know whether it works for you!
- Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:44 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Support for TP-Link TL-WR710n
- Replies: 33
- Views: 98196
Compiled for the TP-Link TL-WR810n, too
BTW: I put up my full notes on *Building Gargoyle for the TL-WR710N* on Github: https://github.com/sheilbronn/Gargoyle-for-TL-WR710N ... After successfully building images for the TL-WR 810 n exactly the same way, I integrated that into the description linked above. My build went successfull (=prod...
- Sun Jun 19, 2022 7:06 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.13.0 : Based on OpenWrt 19.07.8
- Replies: 125
- Views: 1180721
Re: Version 1.13.0 : Based on OpenWrt 19.07.8
https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargoyle/commit/8f37ab7213a04238bde8ee35d3c8bde53093cd14 .... I tried to look around https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/compare/v19.07.8...v19.07.10. But I cant find commit ID similar to put in for "openwrt_commit". Could you please let me know where to f...
- Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:52 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.13.0 : Based on OpenWrt 19.07.8
- Replies: 125
- Views: 1180721
Re: Version 1.13.0 : How about 19.07.10 ?
If nobody has tried yet, is there maybe somebody who could give an estimation of the effort needed and where to start? Thx!
- Thu May 12, 2022 3:25 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Version 1.13.0 : Based on OpenWrt 19.07.8
- Replies: 125
- Views: 1180721
Re: Version 1.13.0 : How about 19.07.10 ?
Hello!
I was wondering whether it would make sense (and wouldn't be too complicated) to re-release 1.13.0 on the latest 19.07 version, being 19.07.10 ? Has anybody tried?
I was wondering whether it would make sense (and wouldn't be too complicated) to re-release 1.13.0 on the latest 19.07 version, being 19.07.10 ? Has anybody tried?