Page 1 of 2

gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:14 pm
by ispyisail
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK

gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent
https://goo.gl/l1wDnl

routers
https://goo.gl/wwnGLJ
fix wifi on really old broadcom devices that miraculously do have enough RAM to run the latest versions of gargoyle, but that don't support wireless N, which is a set of devices that is pretty much limited to the WRT54G-TM, as far as I can tell
bump tor-0.2.6.10
CFLAGS+= -std=gnu99
dnsmasq: backport CVE-2015-3294 security fix
Back port of security fix without bumping dnsmasq version.
Fix is included in CC because dnsmasq version is up to date there.
Fix hostapd patch to apply cleanly. Also bump gargoyle version number
plugin-gargoyle-email-notifications
Improvements and bug fixes.
update ddns hotplug script per suggestions of braveheartleo

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 2:04 am
by tapper
Hi mate is this the last BB build?

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 2:18 am
by Lantis
yea BB 1.8.x

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 2:32 am
by ispyisail
cc building now

suspect Eric will beat me though :)

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 3:08 am
by Lantis
not before i do ;) but i don't have the bandwidth to upload every single image.

Upgraded my wndr3800 and all is well.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 3:39 am
by nworbnhoj
Lantis wrote:but i don't have the bandwidth to upload every single image.
I have often wondered if it would make sense to build these interim versions on an AWS EC2 instance and then the images would end up on S3 and readily shareable (ie avoid the upload)

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 4:20 am
by ispyisail
I have often wondered if it would make sense to build these interim versions on an AWS EC2 instance and then the images would end up on S3 and readily shareable (ie avoid the upload)
yeah.............I have thought this also.

I did a little work on this topic...............But the conclusion I came to is 95% of people use the same common images and 5% use all the other strange images.

so.....if every body downloads the same image 300 times x 5 meg each 1500 meg total

If I use "all" images at 300meg I only need to seed twice (600meg total) with torrents

Form first hand experience Torrents are real efficient

The down side to the end user is that needs to download 300meg each time

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 6:06 am
by tapper
Just flashed my wdr3600 and all is good. Thanks.

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:29 am
by phgerin
Wdr3600: upnp not working, everything else ok!

Re: gargoyle-ispy 2015-September-27 04:09.torrent

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 7:56 am
by Lantis
it does "work", it isn't reporting the data you are looking for correctly because your app doesn't understand 64bit numbers.